From 00cd8dd3bf95f2cc8435b4cac01d9995635c6d0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:13:09 -0400 Subject: stop passing nameidata to ->lookup() Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now... Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ecryptfs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c index a07441a0a878..4ab50c3f5ab2 100644 --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_lookup_interpose(struct dentry *dentry, */ static struct dentry *ecryptfs_lookup(struct inode *ecryptfs_dir_inode, struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry, - struct nameidata *ecryptfs_nd) + unsigned int flags) { char *encrypted_and_encoded_name = NULL; size_t encrypted_and_encoded_name_size; -- cgit v1.2.3 From ebfc3b49a7ac25920cb5be5445f602e51d2ea559 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:05:36 -0400 Subject: don't pass nameidata to ->create() boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead; Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed not to be there yet. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ecryptfs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c index 4ab50c3f5ab2..f079dafea75a 100644 --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c @@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ out: * @dir: The inode of the directory in which to create the file. * @dentry: The eCryptfs dentry * @mode: The mode of the new file. - * @nd: nameidata * * Creates a new file. * @@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ out: */ static int ecryptfs_create(struct inode *directory_inode, struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry, - umode_t mode, struct nameidata *nd) + umode_t mode, bool excl) { struct inode *ecryptfs_inode; int rc; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 312b63fba9e88a0dcf800834b8ede8716bcc1e17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:09:36 -0400 Subject: don't pass nameidata * to vfs_create() all we want is a boolean flag, same as the method gets now Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ecryptfs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c index f079dafea75a..da52cdbe8388 100644 --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ ecryptfs_do_create(struct inode *directory_inode, inode = ERR_CAST(lower_dir_dentry); goto out; } - rc = vfs_create(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode, lower_dentry, mode, NULL); + rc = vfs_create(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode, lower_dentry, mode, true); if (rc) { printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to create dentry in lower fs; " "rc = [%d]\n", __func__, rc); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8fc37ec54cd8e37193b0d42809b785ff19661c34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:18:15 +0400 Subject: don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); is a bad idea; do it the other way round... Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ecryptfs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c index da52cdbe8388..ffa2be57804d 100644 --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c @@ -269,8 +269,8 @@ ecryptfs_create(struct inode *directory_inode, struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry, iput(ecryptfs_inode); goto out; } - d_instantiate(ecryptfs_dentry, ecryptfs_inode); unlock_new_inode(ecryptfs_inode); + d_instantiate(ecryptfs_dentry, ecryptfs_inode); out: return rc; } -- cgit v1.2.3