From 1b8e7e45e57cc98bf6c8ab9b3087d634636ba2e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe David Borba Manana Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:54:58 +0000 Subject: Btrfs: avoid unnecessary ordered extent cache resets After an ordered extent completes, don't blindly reset the inode's ordered tree last accessed ordered extent pointer. While running the xfstests I noticed that about 29% of the time the ordered extent to which tree->last pointed was not the same as our just completed ordered extent. After that I ran the following sysbench test (after a prepare phase) and noticed that about 68% of the time tree->last pointed to a different ordered extent too. sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=4G \ --file-test-mode=rndwr --num-threads=512 \ --file-block-size=32768 --max-time=60 --max-requests=0 run Therefore reset tree->last on ordered extent removal only if it pointed to the ordered extent we're removing from the tree. Results from 4 runs of the following test before and after applying this patch: $ sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=4G \ --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 \ --file-block-size=32768 --max-time=60 --file-io-mode=sync prepare $ sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=4G \ --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 \ --file-block-size=32768 --max-time=60 --file-io-mode=sync run Before this path: run 1 - 64.049Mb/sec run 2 - 63.455Mb/sec run 3 - 64.656Mb/sec run 4 - 63.833Mb/sec After this patch: run 1 - 66.149Mb/sec run 2 - 68.459Mb/sec run 3 - 66.338Mb/sec run 4 - 66.176Mb/sec With random writes (--file-test-mode=rndwr) I had huge fluctuations on the results (+- 35% easily). Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index 69582d5b69d1..b8c2ded75fe2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -520,7 +520,8 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct inode *inode, spin_lock_irq(&tree->lock); node = &entry->rb_node; rb_erase(node, &tree->tree); - tree->last = NULL; + if (tree->last == node) + tree->last = NULL; set_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE, &entry->flags); spin_unlock_irq(&tree->lock); -- cgit v1.2.3 From efe120a067c8674a8ae21b194f0e68f098b61ee2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Holton Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:37:06 -0500 Subject: Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: Frank Holton Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index b8c2ded75fe2..b16450b840e7 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -336,13 +336,14 @@ int btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending(struct inode *inode, entry->len); *file_offset = dec_end; if (dec_start > dec_end) { - printk(KERN_CRIT "bad ordering dec_start %llu end %llu\n", - dec_start, dec_end); + btrfs_crit(BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info, + "bad ordering dec_start %llu end %llu", dec_start, dec_end); } to_dec = dec_end - dec_start; if (to_dec > entry->bytes_left) { - printk(KERN_CRIT "bad ordered accounting left %llu size %llu\n", - entry->bytes_left, to_dec); + btrfs_crit(BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info, + "bad ordered accounting left %llu size %llu", + entry->bytes_left, to_dec); } entry->bytes_left -= to_dec; if (!uptodate) @@ -401,7 +402,8 @@ have_entry: } if (io_size > entry->bytes_left) { - printk(KERN_CRIT "bad ordered accounting left %llu size %llu\n", + btrfs_crit(BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info, + "bad ordered accounting left %llu size %llu", entry->bytes_left, io_size); } entry->bytes_left -= io_size; -- cgit v1.2.3