diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 858 |
1 files changed, 639 insertions, 219 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index f6755fd5bae2..615a2e44d2a0 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -265,10 +265,11 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state) verbose(")"); } } - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL) - verbose(" fp%d=%s", -MAX_BPF_STACK + i, - reg_type_str[state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE].type]); + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + verbose(" fp%d=%s", + (-i - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE, + reg_type_str[state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.type]); } verbose("\n"); } @@ -434,40 +435,133 @@ static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } } -static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx) +static int copy_stack_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) { - struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem; - int insn_idx; + if (!src->stack) + return 0; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dst->allocated_stack < src->allocated_stack)) { + /* internal bug, make state invalid to reject the program */ + memset(dst, 0, sizeof(*dst)); + return -EFAULT; + } + memcpy(dst->stack, src->stack, + sizeof(*src->stack) * (src->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE)); + return 0; +} + +/* do_check() starts with zero-sized stack in struct bpf_verifier_state to + * make it consume minimal amount of memory. check_stack_write() access from + * the program calls into realloc_verifier_state() to grow the stack size. + * Note there is a non-zero 'parent' pointer inside bpf_verifier_state + * which this function copies over. It points to previous bpf_verifier_state + * which is never reallocated + */ +static int realloc_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int size, + bool copy_old) +{ + u32 old_size = state->allocated_stack; + struct bpf_stack_state *new_stack; + int slot = size / BPF_REG_SIZE; + + if (size <= old_size || !size) { + if (copy_old) + return 0; + state->allocated_stack = slot * BPF_REG_SIZE; + if (!size && old_size) { + kfree(state->stack); + state->stack = NULL; + } + return 0; + } + new_stack = kmalloc_array(slot, sizeof(struct bpf_stack_state), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!new_stack) + return -ENOMEM; + if (copy_old) { + if (state->stack) + memcpy(new_stack, state->stack, + sizeof(*new_stack) * (old_size / BPF_REG_SIZE)); + memset(new_stack + old_size / BPF_REG_SIZE, 0, + sizeof(*new_stack) * (size - old_size) / BPF_REG_SIZE); + } + state->allocated_stack = slot * BPF_REG_SIZE; + kfree(state->stack); + state->stack = new_stack; + return 0; +} + +static void free_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + bool free_self) +{ + kfree(state->stack); + if (free_self) + kfree(state); +} + +/* copy verifier state from src to dst growing dst stack space + * when necessary to accommodate larger src stack + */ +static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +{ + int err; + + err = realloc_verifier_state(dst, src->allocated_stack, false); + if (err) + return err; + memcpy(dst, src, offsetof(struct bpf_verifier_state, allocated_stack)); + return copy_stack_state(dst, src); +} + +static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx, + int *insn_idx) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem, *head = env->head; + int err; if (env->head == NULL) - return -1; + return -ENOENT; - memcpy(&env->cur_state, &env->head->st, sizeof(env->cur_state)); - insn_idx = env->head->insn_idx; + if (cur) { + err = copy_verifier_state(cur, &head->st); + if (err) + return err; + } + if (insn_idx) + *insn_idx = head->insn_idx; if (prev_insn_idx) - *prev_insn_idx = env->head->prev_insn_idx; - elem = env->head->next; - kfree(env->head); + *prev_insn_idx = head->prev_insn_idx; + elem = head->next; + free_verifier_state(&head->st, false); + kfree(head); env->head = elem; env->stack_size--; - return insn_idx; + return 0; } static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - int insn_idx, int prev_insn_idx) + int insn_idx, int prev_insn_idx, + bool speculative) { struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + int err; - elem = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem), GFP_KERNEL); + elem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem), GFP_KERNEL); if (!elem) goto err; - memcpy(&elem->st, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); elem->insn_idx = insn_idx; elem->prev_insn_idx = prev_insn_idx; elem->next = env->head; + elem->st.speculative |= speculative; env->head = elem; env->stack_size++; + err = copy_verifier_state(&elem->st, cur); + if (err) + goto err; if (env->stack_size > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK) { verbose("BPF program is too complex\n"); goto err; @@ -475,7 +569,7 @@ static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return &elem->st; err: /* pop all elements and return */ - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); return NULL; } @@ -671,7 +765,7 @@ static void mark_reg_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno) static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum reg_arg_type t) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state->regs; if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) { verbose("R%d is invalid\n", regno); @@ -684,7 +778,7 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno); return -EACCES; } - mark_reg_read(&env->cur_state, regno); + mark_reg_read(env->cur_state, regno); } else { /* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */ if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) { @@ -721,10 +815,21 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno, int insn_idx) { - int i, spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE; + int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE, err; + + err = realloc_verifier_state(state, round_up(slot + 1, BPF_REG_SIZE), + true); + if (err) + return err; /* caller checked that off % size == 0 and -MAX_BPF_STACK <= off < 0, * so it's aligned access and [off, off + size) are within stack limits */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && + state->stack[spi].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL && + size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { + verbose("attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n"); + return -EACCES; + } if (value_regno >= 0 && is_spillable_regtype(state->regs[value_regno].type)) { @@ -736,11 +841,11 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } /* save register state */ - state->spilled_regs[spi] = state->regs[value_regno]; - state->spilled_regs[spi].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = state->regs[value_regno]; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] == STACK_MISC && + if (state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] == STACK_MISC && !env->allow_ptr_leaks) { int *poff = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].sanitize_stack_off; int soff = (-spi - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE; @@ -763,14 +868,15 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } *poff = soff; } - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_SPILL; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_SPILL; } } else { /* regular write of data into stack */ - state->spilled_regs[spi] = (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; for (i = 0; i < size; i++) - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_MISC; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] = + STACK_MISC; } return 0; } @@ -781,10 +887,10 @@ static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slo while (parent) { /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ - if (state->spilled_regs[slot].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + if (state->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) break; /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ - parent->spilled_regs[slot].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + parent->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; state = parent; parent = state->parent; } @@ -793,34 +899,37 @@ static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slo static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { - u8 *slot_type; - int i, spi; + int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + u8 *stype; - slot_type = &state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off]; + if (state->allocated_stack <= slot) { + verbose("invalid read from stack off %d+0 size %d\n", + off, size); + return -EACCES; + } + stype = state->stack[spi].slot_type; - if (slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) { + if (stype[0] == STACK_SPILL) { if (size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { verbose("invalid size of register spill\n"); return -EACCES; } for (i = 1; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) { + if (stype[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) { verbose("corrupted spill memory\n"); return -EACCES; } } - spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE; - if (value_regno >= 0) { /* restore register state from stack */ - state->regs[value_regno] = state->spilled_regs[spi]; + state->regs[value_regno] = state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; mark_stack_slot_read(state, spi); } return 0; } else { for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - if (slot_type[i] != STACK_MISC) { + if (stype[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_MISC) { verbose("invalid read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", off, i, size); return -EACCES; @@ -833,11 +942,37 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, } } +static int check_stack_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, + int off, int size) +{ + /* Stack accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we + * can determine what type of data were returned. See + * check_stack_read(). + */ + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose("variable stack access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d", + tn_buf, off, size); + return -EACCES; + } + + if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK) { + verbose("invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, size); + return -EACCES; + } + + return 0; +} + /* check read/write into map element returned by bpf_map_lookup_elem() */ static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size) { - struct bpf_map *map = env->cur_state.regs[regno].map_ptr; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_map *map = regs[regno].map_ptr; if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || off + size > map->value_size) { verbose("invalid access to map value, value_size=%d off=%d size=%d\n", @@ -849,9 +984,9 @@ static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, /* check read/write into a map element with possible variable offset */ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, - int off, int size) + int off, int size) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; int err; @@ -861,13 +996,17 @@ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, */ if (log_level) print_verifier_state(state); + /* The minimum value is only important with signed * comparisons where we can't assume the floor of a * value is 0. If we are using signed variables for our * index'es we need to make sure that whatever we use * will have a set floor within our range. */ - if (reg->smin_value < 0) { + if (reg->smin_value < 0 && + (reg->smin_value == S64_MIN || + (off + reg->smin_value != (s64)(s32)(off + reg->smin_value)) || + reg->smin_value + off < 0)) { verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n", regno); return -EACCES; @@ -924,7 +1063,7 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int __check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || (u64)off + size > reg->range) { @@ -938,7 +1077,7 @@ static int __check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; int err; @@ -1008,19 +1147,19 @@ static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { - return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]); + return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, cur_regs(env) + regno); } static bool is_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &env->cur_state.regs[regno]; + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = cur_regs(env) + regno; return reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX; } static bool is_pkt_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &env->cur_state.regs[regno]; + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = cur_regs(env) + regno; return reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET; } @@ -1112,6 +1251,30 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return check_generic_ptr_alignment(reg, pointer_desc, off, size, strict); } +static int check_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno) +{ + /* Access to ctx or passing it to a helper is only allowed in + * its original, unmodified form. + */ + + if (reg->off) { + verbose("dereference of modified ctx ptr R%d off=%d disallowed\n", + regno, reg->off); + return -EACCES; + } + + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) || reg->var_off.value) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose("variable ctx access var_off=%s disallowed\n", tn_buf); + return -EACCES; + } + + return 0; +} + /* truncate register to smaller size (in bytes) * must be called with size < BPF_REG_SIZE */ @@ -1145,8 +1308,9 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn int off, int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t, int value_regno, bool strict_alignment_once) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; - struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_reg_state *reg = regs + regno; int size, err = 0; size = bpf_size_to_bytes(bpf_size); @@ -1170,7 +1334,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(regs, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) { enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE; @@ -1180,22 +1344,10 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn verbose("R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno); return -EACCES; } - /* ctx accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can - * determine what type of data were returned. - */ - if (reg->off) { - verbose("dereference of modified ctx ptr R%d off=%d+%d, ctx+const is allowed, ctx+const+const is not\n", - regno, reg->off, off - reg->off); - return -EACCES; - } - if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) || reg->var_off.value) { - char tn_buf[48]; + err = check_ctx_reg(env, reg, regno); + if (err < 0) + return err; - tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); - verbose("variable ctx access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d", - tn_buf, off, size); - return -EACCES; - } err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { /* ctx access returns either a scalar, or a @@ -1203,49 +1355,29 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn * the offset is zero. */ if (reg_type == SCALAR_VALUE) - mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(regs, value_regno); else - mark_reg_known_zero(state->regs, value_regno); - state->regs[value_regno].id = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].off = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].range = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; + mark_reg_known_zero(regs, value_regno); + regs[value_regno].id = 0; + regs[value_regno].off = 0; + regs[value_regno].range = 0; + regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; } } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { - /* stack accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can - * determine what type of data were returned. - * See check_stack_read(). - */ - if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { - char tn_buf[48]; - - tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); - verbose("variable stack access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d", - tn_buf, off, size); - return -EACCES; - } off += reg->var_off.value; - if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK) { - verbose("invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, size); - return -EACCES; - } + err = check_stack_access(env, reg, off, size); + if (err) + return err; if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; - if (t == BPF_WRITE) { - if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off] == STACK_SPILL && - size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { - verbose("attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n"); - return -EACCES; - } + if (t == BPF_WRITE) err = check_stack_write(env, state, off, size, value_regno, insn_idx); - } else { + else err = check_stack_read(state, off, size, value_regno); - } } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { if (t == BPF_WRITE && !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, t)) { verbose("cannot write into packet\n"); @@ -1258,7 +1390,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn } err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_reg_unknown(state->regs, value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(regs, value_regno); } else { verbose("R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno, reg_type_str[reg->type]); @@ -1266,9 +1398,9 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn } if (!err && size < BPF_REG_SIZE && value_regno >= 0 && t == BPF_READ && - state->regs[value_regno].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { + regs[value_regno].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { /* b/h/w load zero-extends, mark upper bits as known 0 */ - coerce_reg_to_size(&state->regs[value_regno], size); + coerce_reg_to_size(®s[value_regno], size); } return err; } @@ -1333,9 +1465,9 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; - int off, i; + int off, i, slot, spi; if (regs[regno].type != PTR_TO_STACK) { /* Allow zero-byte read from NULL, regardless of pointer type */ @@ -1376,7 +1508,11 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, } for (i = 0; i < access_size; i++) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] != STACK_MISC) { + slot = -(off + i) - 1; + spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + if (state->allocated_stack <= slot || + state->stack[spi].slot_type[slot % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + STACK_MISC) { verbose("invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", off, i, access_size); return -EACCES; @@ -1389,7 +1525,7 @@ static int check_helper_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *reg = ®s[regno]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; switch (reg->type) { case PTR_TO_PACKET: @@ -1406,7 +1542,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *reg = ®s[regno]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; enum bpf_reg_type expected_type, type = reg->type; int err = 0; @@ -1449,6 +1585,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, expected_type = PTR_TO_CTX; if (type != expected_type) goto err_type; + err = check_ctx_reg(env, reg, regno); + if (err < 0) + return err; } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM || arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM) { expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK; @@ -1678,7 +1817,7 @@ static int check_raw_mode(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn) */ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; int i; @@ -1687,10 +1826,10 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) mark_reg_unknown(regs, i); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET_END) continue; @@ -1700,9 +1839,8 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs; struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta; bool changes_data; int i, err; @@ -1776,6 +1914,7 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) return err; } + regs = cur_regs(env); /* reset caller saved regs */ for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); @@ -1880,6 +2019,125 @@ static bool check_reg_sane_offset(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return true; } +static struct bpf_insn_aux_data *cur_aux(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + return &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx]; +} + +static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, + u32 *ptr_limit, u8 opcode, bool off_is_neg) +{ + bool mask_to_left = (opcode == BPF_ADD && off_is_neg) || + (opcode == BPF_SUB && !off_is_neg); + u32 off; + + switch (ptr_reg->type) { + case PTR_TO_STACK: + off = ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value; + if (mask_to_left) + *ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off; + else + *ptr_limit = -off; + return 0; + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + if (mask_to_left) { + *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off; + } else { + off = ptr_reg->smin_value + ptr_reg->off; + *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off; + } + return 0; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } +} + +static bool can_skip_alu_sanitation(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + return env->allow_ptr_leaks || BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K; +} + +static int update_alu_sanitation_state(struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux, + u32 alu_state, u32 alu_limit) +{ + /* If we arrived here from different branches with different + * state or limits to sanitize, then this won't work. + */ + if (aux->alu_state && + (aux->alu_state != alu_state || + aux->alu_limit != alu_limit)) + return -EACCES; + + /* Corresponding fixup done in fixup_bpf_calls(). */ + aux->alu_state = alu_state; + aux->alu_limit = alu_limit; + return 0; +} + +static int sanitize_val_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = cur_aux(env); + + if (can_skip_alu_sanitation(env, insn)) + return 0; + + return update_alu_sanitation_state(aux, BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER, 0); +} + +static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn, + const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, + bool off_is_neg) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = cur_aux(env); + bool ptr_is_dst_reg = ptr_reg == dst_reg; + u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); + u32 alu_state, alu_limit; + struct bpf_reg_state tmp; + bool ret; + + if (can_skip_alu_sanitation(env, insn)) + return 0; + + /* We already marked aux for masking from non-speculative + * paths, thus we got here in the first place. We only care + * to explore bad access from here. + */ + if (vstate->speculative) + goto do_sim; + + alu_state = off_is_neg ? BPF_ALU_NEG_VALUE : 0; + alu_state |= ptr_is_dst_reg ? + BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC : BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_DST; + + if (retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, &alu_limit, opcode, off_is_neg)) + return 0; + if (update_alu_sanitation_state(aux, alu_state, alu_limit)) + return -EACCES; +do_sim: + /* Simulate and find potential out-of-bounds access under + * speculative execution from truncation as a result of + * masking when off was not within expected range. If off + * sits in dst, then we temporarily need to move ptr there + * to simulate dst (== 0) +/-= ptr. Needed, for example, + * for cases where we use K-based arithmetic in one direction + * and truncated reg-based in the other in order to explore + * bad access. + */ + if (!ptr_is_dst_reg) { + tmp = *dst_reg; + *dst_reg = *ptr_reg; + } + ret = push_stack(env, env->insn_idx + 1, env->insn_idx, true); + if (!ptr_is_dst_reg && ret) + *dst_reg = tmp; + return !ret ? -EFAULT : 0; +} + /* Handles arithmetic on a pointer and a scalar: computes new min/max and var_off. * Caller should also handle BPF_MOV case separately. * If we return -EACCES, caller may want to try again treating pointer as a @@ -1890,14 +2148,15 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg; bool known = tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off); s64 smin_val = off_reg->smin_value, smax_val = off_reg->smax_value, smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value; u64 umin_val = off_reg->umin_value, umax_val = off_reg->umax_value, umin_ptr = ptr_reg->umin_value, umax_ptr = ptr_reg->umax_value; + u32 dst = insn->dst_reg, src = insn->src_reg; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); - u32 dst = insn->dst_reg; + int ret; dst_reg = ®s[dst]; @@ -1949,6 +2208,11 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, switch (opcode) { case BPF_ADD: + ret = sanitize_ptr_alu(env, insn, ptr_reg, dst_reg, smin_val < 0); + if (ret < 0) { + verbose("R%d tried to add from different maps or paths\n", dst); + return ret; + } /* We can take a fixed offset as long as it doesn't overflow * the s32 'off' field */ @@ -1999,6 +2263,11 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } break; case BPF_SUB: + ret = sanitize_ptr_alu(env, insn, ptr_reg, dst_reg, smin_val < 0); + if (ret < 0) { + verbose("R%d tried to sub from different maps or paths\n", dst); + return ret; + } if (dst_reg == off_reg) { /* scalar -= pointer. Creates an unknown scalar */ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) @@ -2071,6 +2340,13 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, verbose("R%d bitwise operator %s on pointer prohibited\n", dst, bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]); return -EACCES; + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && !known && (smin_val < 0) != (smax_val < 0)) { + verbose("R%d has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root\n", + off_reg == dst_reg ? dst : src); + return -EACCES; + } + /* fall-through */ default: /* other operators (e.g. MUL,LSH) produce non-pointer results */ if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) @@ -2085,6 +2361,25 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg); __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg); + + /* For unprivileged we require that resulting offset must be in bounds + * in order to be able to sanitize access later on. + */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + if (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE && + check_map_access(env, dst, dst_reg->off, 1)) { + verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range, " + "prohibited for !root\n", dst); + return -EACCES; + } else if (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && + check_stack_access(env, dst_reg, dst_reg->off + + dst_reg->var_off.value, 1)) { + verbose("R%d stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range, " + "prohibited for !root\n", dst); + return -EACCES; + } + } + return 0; } @@ -2097,12 +2392,14 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, struct bpf_reg_state src_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); bool src_known, dst_known; s64 smin_val, smax_val; u64 umin_val, umax_val; u64 insn_bitness = (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) ? 64 : 32; + u32 dst = insn->dst_reg; + int ret; if (insn_bitness == 32) { /* Relevant for 32-bit RSH: Information can propagate towards @@ -2137,6 +2434,11 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, switch (opcode) { case BPF_ADD: + ret = sanitize_val_alu(env, insn); + if (ret < 0) { + verbose("R%d tried to add from different pointers or scalars\n", dst); + return ret; + } if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) || signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smax_val)) { dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; @@ -2156,6 +2458,11 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off); break; case BPF_SUB: + ret = sanitize_val_alu(env, insn); + if (ret < 0) { + verbose("R%d tried to sub from different pointers or scalars\n", dst); + return ret; + } if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) || signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smin_val)) { /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */ @@ -2345,7 +2652,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg, *src_reg; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg, *src_reg; struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg = NULL, off_reg = {0}; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int rc; @@ -2419,12 +2726,12 @@ static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* Got here implies adding two SCALAR_VALUEs */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr_reg)) { - print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env->cur_state); verbose("verifier internal error: unexpected ptr_reg\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (WARN_ON(!src_reg)) { - print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env->cur_state); verbose("verifier internal error: no src_reg\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2434,7 +2741,7 @@ static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* check validity of 32-bit and 64-bit arithmetic operations */ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; @@ -2661,10 +2968,10 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, /* keep the maximum range already checked */ regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id) reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range); } @@ -2914,17 +3221,17 @@ static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno, for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - mark_map_reg(state->spilled_regs, i / BPF_REG_SIZE, id, is_null); + mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null); } } static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, int *insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = this_branch->regs, *dst_reg; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; @@ -2984,7 +3291,8 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } } - other_branch = push_stack(env, *insn_idx + insn->off + 1, *insn_idx); + other_branch = push_stack(env, *insn_idx + insn->off + 1, *insn_idx, + false); if (!other_branch) return -EFAULT; @@ -3087,7 +3395,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *ld_imm64_to_map_ptr(struct bpf_insn *insn) /* verify BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction */ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); int err; if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) { @@ -3148,7 +3456,8 @@ static bool may_access_skb(enum bpf_prog_type type) */ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + static const int ctx_reg = BPF_REG_6; u8 mode = BPF_MODE(insn->code); int i, err; @@ -3165,11 +3474,11 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check whether implicit source operand (register R6) is readable */ - err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, ctx_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; - if (regs[BPF_REG_6].type != PTR_TO_CTX) { + if (regs[ctx_reg].type != PTR_TO_CTX) { verbose("at the time of BPF_LD_ABS|IND R6 != pointer to skb\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3181,6 +3490,10 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return err; } + err = check_ctx_reg(env, ®s[ctx_reg], ctx_reg); + if (err < 0) + return err; + /* reset caller saved regs to unreadable */ for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); @@ -3534,6 +3847,57 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, return false; } +static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_state *old, + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur, + struct idpair *idmap) +{ + int i, spi; + + /* if explored stack has more populated slots than current stack + * such stacks are not equivalent + */ + if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack) + return false; + + /* walk slots of the explored stack and ignore any additional + * slots in the current stack, since explored(safe) state + * didn't use them + */ + for (i = 0; i < old->allocated_stack; i++) { + spi = i / BPF_REG_SIZE; + + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_INVALID) + continue; + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) + /* Ex: old explored (safe) state has STACK_SPILL in + * this stack slot, but current has has STACK_MISC -> + * this verifier states are not equivalent, + * return false to continue verification of this path + */ + return false; + if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) + continue; + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (!regsafe(&old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + idmap)) + /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing + * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types + * are the same as well. + * Ex: explored safe path could have stored + * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -8} + * but current path has stored: + * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -16} + * such verifier states are not equivalent. + * return false to continue verification of this path + */ + return false; + } + return true; +} + /* compare two verifier states * * all states stored in state_list are known to be valid, since @@ -3568,6 +3932,12 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, bool ret = false; int i; + /* Verification state from speculative execution simulation + * must never prune a non-speculative execution one. + */ + if (old->speculative && !cur->speculative) + return false; + idmap = kcalloc(ID_MAP_SIZE, sizeof(struct idpair), GFP_KERNEL); /* If we failed to allocate the idmap, just say it's not safe */ if (!idmap) @@ -3578,37 +3948,8 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, goto out_free; } - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i++) { - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_INVALID) - continue; - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != cur->stack_slot_type[i]) - /* Ex: old explored (safe) state has STACK_SPILL in - * this stack slot, but current has has STACK_MISC -> - * this verifier states are not equivalent, - * return false to continue verification of this path - */ - goto out_free; - if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) - continue; - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - if (!regsafe(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], - &cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], - idmap)) - /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing - * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types - * are the same as well. - * Ex: explored safe path could have stored - * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -8} - * but current path has stored: - * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -16} - * such verifier states are not equivalent. - * return false to continue verification of this path - */ - goto out_free; - else - continue; - } + if (!stacksafe(old, cur, idmap)) + goto out_free; ret = true; out_free: kfree(idmap); @@ -3644,17 +3985,19 @@ static bool do_propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, } } /* ... and stack slots */ - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (parent->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE && + i < parent->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (parent->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (state->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (parent->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) + if (parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) continue; - if (writes && (state->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) + if (writes && + (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) continue; - if (state->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) { - parent->spilled_regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + if (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) { + parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; touched = true; } } @@ -3684,7 +4027,8 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_verifier_state_list *new_sl; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; - int i; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + int i, err; sl = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; if (!sl) @@ -3694,7 +4038,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) return 0; while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { - if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state)) { + if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, cur)) { /* reached equivalent register/stack state, * prune the search. * Registers read by the continuation are read by us. @@ -3705,7 +4049,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * they'll be immediately forgotten as we're pruning * this state and will pop a new one. */ - propagate_liveness(&sl->state, &env->cur_state); + propagate_liveness(&sl->state, cur); return 1; } sl = sl->next; @@ -3717,16 +4061,21 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * it will be rejected. Since there are no loops, we won't be * seeing this 'insn_idx' instruction again on the way to bpf_exit */ - new_sl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_USER); + new_sl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_KERNEL); if (!new_sl) return -ENOMEM; /* add new state to the head of linked list */ - memcpy(&new_sl->state, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); + err = copy_verifier_state(&new_sl->state, cur); + if (err) { + free_verifier_state(&new_sl->state, false); + kfree(new_sl); + return err; + } new_sl->next = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; env->explored_states[insn_idx] = new_sl; /* connect new state to parentage chain */ - env->cur_state.parent = &new_sl->state; + cur->parent = &new_sl->state; /* clear write marks in current state: the writes we did are not writes * our child did, so they don't screen off its reads from us. * (There are no read marks in current state, because reads always mark @@ -3734,10 +4083,10 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * explored_states can get read marks.) */ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) - env->cur_state.regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) - if (env->cur_state.stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_SPILL) - env->cur_state.spilled_regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + cur->regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + for (i = 0; i < cur->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + if (cur->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + cur->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live = REG_LIVE_NONE; return 0; } @@ -3752,29 +4101,31 @@ static int ext_analyzer_insn_hook(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state; struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs; int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; - int insn_idx, prev_insn_idx = 0; int insn_processed = 0; bool do_print_state = false; - init_reg_state(regs); + state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!state) + return -ENOMEM; + env->cur_state = state; + init_reg_state(state->regs); state->parent = NULL; - insn_idx = 0; for (;;) { struct bpf_insn *insn; u8 class; int err; - if (insn_idx >= insn_cnt) { + if (env->insn_idx >= insn_cnt) { verbose("invalid insn idx %d insn_cnt %d\n", - insn_idx, insn_cnt); + env->insn_idx, insn_cnt); return -EFAULT; } - insn = &insns[insn_idx]; + insn = &insns[env->insn_idx]; class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); if (++insn_processed > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS) { @@ -3783,17 +4134,19 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -E2BIG; } - err = is_state_visited(env, insn_idx); + err = is_state_visited(env, env->insn_idx); if (err < 0) return err; if (err == 1) { /* found equivalent state, can prune the search */ if (log_level) { if (do_print_state) - verbose("\nfrom %d to %d: safe\n", - prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); + verbose("\nfrom %d to %d%s: safe\n", + env->prev_insn_idx, env->insn_idx, + env->cur_state->speculative ? + " (speculative execution)" : ""); else - verbose("%d: safe\n", insn_idx); + verbose("%d: safe\n", env->insn_idx); } goto process_bpf_exit; } @@ -3803,24 +4156,27 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (log_level > 1 || (log_level && do_print_state)) { if (log_level > 1) - verbose("%d:", insn_idx); + verbose("%d:", env->insn_idx); else - verbose("\nfrom %d to %d:", - prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); - print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state); + verbose("\nfrom %d to %d%s:", + env->prev_insn_idx, env->insn_idx, + env->cur_state->speculative ? + " (speculative execution)" : ""); + print_verifier_state(env->cur_state); do_print_state = false; } if (log_level) { - verbose("%d: ", insn_idx); + verbose("%d: ", env->insn_idx); print_bpf_insn(env, insn); } - err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx); + err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, env->insn_idx, env->prev_insn_idx); if (err) return err; - env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true; + regs = cur_regs(env); + env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].seen = true; if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { err = check_alu_op(env, insn); if (err) @@ -3845,13 +4201,13 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) /* check that memory (src_reg + off) is readable, * the state of dst_reg will be updated by this func */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->src_reg, insn->off, - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, - insn->dst_reg, false); + err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->src_reg, + insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), + BPF_READ, insn->dst_reg, false); if (err) return err; - prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type; + prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].ptr_type; if (*prev_src_type == NOT_INIT) { /* saw a valid insn @@ -3878,10 +4234,10 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type; if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) { - err = check_xadd(env, insn_idx, insn); + err = check_xadd(env, env->insn_idx, insn); if (err) return err; - insn_idx++; + env->insn_idx++; continue; } @@ -3897,13 +4253,13 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) dst_reg_type = regs[insn->dst_reg].type; /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, - insn->src_reg, false); + err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, + insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), + BPF_WRITE, insn->src_reg, false); if (err) return err; - prev_dst_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type; + prev_dst_type = &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].ptr_type; if (*prev_dst_type == NOT_INIT) { *prev_dst_type = dst_reg_type; @@ -3932,9 +4288,9 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, - -1, false); + err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, + insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), + BPF_WRITE, -1, false); if (err) return err; @@ -3950,7 +4306,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } - err = check_call(env, insn->imm, insn_idx); + err = check_call(env, insn->imm, env->insn_idx); if (err) return err; @@ -3963,7 +4319,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } - insn_idx += insn->off + 1; + env->insn_idx += insn->off + 1; continue; } else if (opcode == BPF_EXIT) { @@ -3991,15 +4347,17 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } process_bpf_exit: - insn_idx = pop_stack(env, &prev_insn_idx); - if (insn_idx < 0) { + err = pop_stack(env, &env->prev_insn_idx, &env->insn_idx); + if (err < 0) { + if (err != -ENOENT) + return err; break; } else { do_print_state = true; continue; } } else { - err = check_cond_jmp_op(env, insn, &insn_idx); + err = check_cond_jmp_op(env, insn, &env->insn_idx); if (err) return err; } @@ -4016,8 +4374,8 @@ process_bpf_exit: if (err) return err; - insn_idx++; - env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true; + env->insn_idx++; + env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].seen = true; } else { verbose("invalid BPF_LD mode\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -4027,7 +4385,7 @@ process_bpf_exit: return -EINVAL; } - insn_idx++; + env->insn_idx++; } verbose("processed %d insns, stack depth %d\n", @@ -4402,6 +4760,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) struct bpf_prog *new_prog; struct bpf_map *map_ptr; int i, cnt, delta = 0; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux; for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) { if (insn->code == (BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X) || @@ -4422,6 +4781,58 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) continue; } + if (insn->code == (BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X) || + insn->code == (BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X)) { + const u8 code_add = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X; + const u8 code_sub = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X; + struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16]; + struct bpf_insn *patch = &insn_buf[0]; + bool issrc, isneg; + u32 off_reg; + + aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i + delta]; + if (!aux->alu_state || + aux->alu_state == BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER) + continue; + + isneg = aux->alu_state & BPF_ALU_NEG_VALUE; + issrc = (aux->alu_state & BPF_ALU_SANITIZE) == + BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC; + + off_reg = issrc ? insn->src_reg : insn->dst_reg; + if (isneg) + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, off_reg, -1); + *patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit - 1); + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg); + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg); + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0); + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_AX, 63); + if (issrc) { + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_AX, + off_reg); + insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_AX; + } else { + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, off_reg, + BPF_REG_AX); + } + if (isneg) + insn->code = insn->code == code_add ? + code_sub : code_add; + *patch++ = *insn; + if (issrc && isneg) + *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, off_reg, -1); + cnt = patch - insn_buf; + + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + continue; + } + if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)) continue; @@ -4557,6 +4968,7 @@ static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (sl) while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { sln = sl->next; + free_verifier_state(&sl->state, false); kfree(sl); sl = sln; } @@ -4633,9 +5045,13 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); ret = do_check(env); + if (env->cur_state) { + free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true); + env->cur_state = NULL; + } skip_full_check: - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); free_states(env); if (ret == 0) @@ -4741,9 +5157,13 @@ int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops, env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); ret = do_check(env); + if (env->cur_state) { + free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true); + env->cur_state = NULL; + } skip_full_check: - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); free_states(env); mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock); |