diff options
| author | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> | 2013-08-27 18:45:10 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-12-04 10:50:28 -0800 |
| commit | b22831e6611bec1fdf84e71d80f7917199212ee8 (patch) | |
| tree | 27fcd58be5c25b704b053f50f25346309fc999ec | |
| parent | 0aa9fced961d071a0e19c384b2f2c2e50a676602 (diff) | |
mtd: nand: hack ONFI for non-power-of-2 dimensions
commit 4355b70cf48363c50a9de450b01178c83aba8f6a upstream.
Some bright specification writers decided to write this in the ONFI spec
(from ONFI 3.0, Section 3.1):
"The number of blocks and number of pages per block is not required to
be a power of two. In the case where one of these values is not a
power of two, the corresponding address shall be rounded to an
integral number of bits such that it addresses a range up to the
subsequent power of two value. The host shall not access upper
addresses in a range that is shown as not supported."
This breaks every assumption MTD makes about NAND block/chip-size
dimensions -- they *must* be a power of two!
And of course, an enterprising manufacturer has made use of this lovely
freedom. Exhibit A: Micron MT29F32G08CBADAWP
"- Plane size: 2 planes x 1064 blocks per plane
- Device size: 32Gb: 2128 blockss [sic]"
This quickly hits a BUG() in nand_base.c, since the extra dimensions
overflow so we think it's a second chip (on my single-chip setup):
ONFI param page 0 valid
ONFI flash detected
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0x44 (Micron MT29F32G08CBADAWP), 4256MiB, page size: 8192, OOB size: 744
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c:203!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP ARM
[... trim ...]
[<c02cf3e4>] (nand_select_chip+0x18/0x2c) from [<c02d25c0>] (nand_do_read_ops+0x90/0x424)
[<c02d25c0>] (nand_do_read_ops+0x90/0x424) from [<c02d2dd8>] (nand_read+0x54/0x78)
[<c02d2dd8>] (nand_read+0x54/0x78) from [<c02ad2c8>] (mtd_read+0x84/0xbc)
[<c02ad2c8>] (mtd_read+0x84/0xbc) from [<c02d4b28>] (scan_read.clone.4+0x4c/0x64)
[<c02d4b28>] (scan_read.clone.4+0x4c/0x64) from [<c02d4c88>] (search_bbt+0x148/0x290)
[<c02d4c88>] (search_bbt+0x148/0x290) from [<c02d4ea4>] (nand_scan_bbt+0xd4/0x5c0)
[... trim ...]
---[ end trace 0c9363860d865ff2 ]---
So to fix this, just truncate these dimensions down to the greatest
power-of-2 dimension that is less than or equal to the specified
dimension.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index eb9f5fb02eef..e50a0b481458 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -2888,10 +2888,21 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, sanitize_string(p->model, sizeof(p->model)); if (!mtd->name) mtd->name = p->model; + mtd->writesize = le32_to_cpu(p->byte_per_page); - mtd->erasesize = le32_to_cpu(p->pages_per_block) * mtd->writesize; + + /* + * pages_per_block and blocks_per_lun may not be a power-of-2 size + * (don't ask me who thought of this...). MTD assumes that these + * dimensions will be power-of-2, so just truncate the remaining area. + */ + mtd->erasesize = 1 << (fls(le32_to_cpu(p->pages_per_block)) - 1); + mtd->erasesize *= mtd->writesize; + mtd->oobsize = le16_to_cpu(p->spare_bytes_per_page); - chip->chipsize = le32_to_cpu(p->blocks_per_lun); + + /* See erasesize comment */ + chip->chipsize = 1 << (fls(le32_to_cpu(p->blocks_per_lun)) - 1); chip->chipsize *= (uint64_t)mtd->erasesize * p->lun_count; *busw = 0; if (le16_to_cpu(p->features) & 1) |