summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>2012-10-04 17:11:25 -0700
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>2012-10-17 03:49:35 +0100
commit7b786bcb5899a366ab272776dfd4b47a0bd1fe6b (patch)
tree4409bf9da31a959b43bb84becd209e4d01c50c04
parent78333ac70289fc366841818359135402163e1927 (diff)
drivers/scsi/atp870u.c: fix bad use of udelay
commit 0f6d93aa9d96cc9022b51bd10d462b03296be146 upstream. The ACARD driver calls udelay() with a value > 2000, which leads to to the following compilation error on ARM: ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/scsi/atp870u.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 This is because udelay is defined on ARM, roughly speaking, as #define udelay(n) ((n) > 2000 ? __bad_udelay() : \ __const_udelay((n) * ((2199023U*HZ)>>11))) The argument to __const_udelay is the number of jiffies to wait divided by 4, but this does not work unless the multiplication does not overflow, and that is what the build error is designed to prevent. The intended behavior can be achieved by using mdelay to call udelay multiple times in a loop. [jrnieder@gmail.com: adding context] Signed-off-by: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
-rw-r--r--drivers/scsi/atp870u.c11
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
index 7e6eca4a125e..59fc5a1fdae0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
@@ -1174,7 +1174,16 @@ wait_io1:
outw(val, tmport);
outb(2, 0x80);
TCM_SYNC:
- udelay(0x800);
+ /*
+ * The funny division into multiple delays is to accomodate
+ * arches like ARM where udelay() multiplies its argument by
+ * a large number to initialize a loop counter. To avoid
+ * overflow, the maximum supported udelay is 2000 microseconds.
+ *
+ * XXX it would be more polite to find a way to use msleep()
+ */
+ mdelay(2);
+ udelay(48);
if ((inb(tmport) & 0x80) == 0x00) { /* bsy ? */
outw(0, tmport--);
outb(0, tmport);