diff options
| author | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2014-05-20 15:55:21 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> | 2014-06-09 15:53:34 +0200 |
| commit | 94b7b52bd91e0bb9ed304d7f5de3711defdc42c6 (patch) | |
| tree | ed68843322f01535f0c70ba19128e25e36a12bcf | |
| parent | a55dfea8623fadef4f0985be3f84a54a92718192 (diff) | |
nfsd4: remove lockowner when removing lock stateid
commit a1b8ff4c97b4375d21b6d6c45d75877303f61b3b upstream.
The nfsv4 state code has always assumed a one-to-one correspondance
between lock stateid's and lockowners even if it appears not to in some
places.
We may actually change that, but for now when FREE_STATEID releases a
lock stateid it also needs to release the parent lockowner.
Symptoms were a subsequent LOCK crashing in find_lockowner_str when it
calls same_lockowner_ino on a lockowner that unexpectedly has an empty
so_stateids list.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 6f1250c14606..ded7af3c45e1 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -3696,9 +3696,16 @@ out: static __be32 nfsd4_free_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp) { - if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lockowner(stp->st_stateowner))) + struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = lockowner(stp->st_stateowner); + + if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo)) return nfserr_locks_held; - release_lock_stateid(stp); + /* + * Currently there's a 1-1 lock stateid<->lockowner + * correspondance, and we have to delete the lockowner when we + * delete the lock stateid: + */ + unhash_lockowner(lo); return nfs_ok; } |