summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>2010-04-01 15:55:48 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>2010-04-01 15:55:48 -0700
commite4f176e9356dcd7155d91456b4d8e2fe1b85edbe (patch)
tree713ec70f276acf83581826c5b87d7b184d11a422
parent04bd6922cb0f89cd3d2e6ac86792ef59d77c2b9f (diff)
hwmon: (lm78) Request I/O ports individually for probing
commit 197027e6ef830d60e10f76efc8d12bf3b6c35db5 upstream. Different motherboards have different PNP declarations for LM78/LM79 chips. Some declare the whole range of I/O ports (8 ports), some declare only the useful ports (2 ports at offset 5) and some declare fancy ranges, for example 4 ports at offset 4. To properly handle all cases, request all ports individually for probing. After we have determined that we really have an LM78 or LM79 chip, the useful port range will be requested again, as a single block. This fixes the driver on the Olivetti M3000 DT 540, at least. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-rw-r--r--drivers/hwmon/lm78.c25
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm78.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm78.c
index a1787fdf5b9f..2348622b533c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm78.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm78.c
@@ -870,17 +870,16 @@ static struct lm78_data *lm78_update_device(struct device *dev)
static int __init lm78_isa_found(unsigned short address)
{
int val, save, found = 0;
-
- /* We have to request the region in two parts because some
- boards declare base+4 to base+7 as a PNP device */
- if (!request_region(address, 4, "lm78")) {
- pr_debug("lm78: Failed to request low part of region\n");
- return 0;
- }
- if (!request_region(address + 4, 4, "lm78")) {
- pr_debug("lm78: Failed to request high part of region\n");
- release_region(address, 4);
- return 0;
+ int port;
+
+ /* Some boards declare base+0 to base+7 as a PNP device, some base+4
+ * to base+7 and some base+5 to base+6. So we better request each port
+ * individually for the probing phase. */
+ for (port = address; port < address + LM78_EXTENT; port++) {
+ if (!request_region(port, 1, "lm78")) {
+ pr_debug("lm78: Failed to request port 0x%x\n", port);
+ goto release;
+ }
}
#define REALLY_SLOW_IO
@@ -944,8 +943,8 @@ static int __init lm78_isa_found(unsigned short address)
val & 0x80 ? "LM79" : "LM78", (int)address);
release:
- release_region(address + 4, 4);
- release_region(address, 4);
+ for (port--; port >= address; port--)
+ release_region(port, 1);
return found;
}