summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>2008-06-10 14:12:50 +0800
committerLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>2008-06-11 19:13:47 -0400
commitbc45b1d39a925b56796bebf8a397a0491489d85c (patch)
tree0a69ef3a3cdb1cdf0f181c25583284e7a0a91fcf
parent7aa7d4336df34e32195557a1ad422627bd69ef0b (diff)
ACPICA: Ignore ACPI table signature for Load() operator
Only "SSDT" is acceptable to the ACPI spec, but tables are seen with OEMx and null sigs. Therefore, signature validation is worthless. Apparently MS ACPI accepts such signatures, ACPICA must be compatible. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/tables/tbinstal.c25
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbinstal.c b/drivers/acpi/tables/tbinstal.c
index 402f93e1ff20..5336ce88f89f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/tables/tbinstal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/tables/tbinstal.c
@@ -123,24 +123,13 @@ acpi_tb_add_table(struct acpi_table_desc *table_desc,
}
}
- /* The table must be either an SSDT or a PSDT or an OEMx */
-
- if (!ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(table_desc->pointer->signature, ACPI_SIG_PSDT)&&
- !ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(table_desc->pointer->signature, ACPI_SIG_SSDT)&&
- strncmp(table_desc->pointer->signature, "OEM", 3)) {
- /* Check for a printable name */
- if (acpi_ut_valid_acpi_name(
- *(u32 *) table_desc->pointer->signature)) {
- ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Table has invalid signature "
- "[%4.4s], must be SSDT or PSDT",
- table_desc->pointer->signature));
- } else {
- ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Table has invalid signature "
- "(0x%8.8X), must be SSDT or PSDT",
- *(u32 *) table_desc->pointer->signature));
- }
- return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_SIGNATURE);
- }
+ /*
+ * Originally, we checked the table signature for "SSDT" or "PSDT" here.
+ * Next, we added support for OEMx tables, signature "OEM".
+ * Valid tables were encountered with a null signature, so we've just
+ * given up on validating the signature, since it seems to be a waste
+ * of code. The original code was removed (05/2008).
+ */
(void)acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_TABLES);